Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of in-hospital serious adverse events in patients ≥75 years of age undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair

Published:December 14, 2022DOI:



      This study sought to identify the factors associated with the occurrence of in-hospital serious adverse events after elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in older patients within the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment.


      Consecutive patients ages ≥75 years who received GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ) for elective EVAR. Based on the age at index elective EVAR, patients were categorized into 3 groups for subsequent analyses: those ages 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and ≥85 years. The primary end points for this study were the incidence of serious adverse events and all-cause mortality. In-hospital complications were defined according to the International Organization for Standardization 14155 standard ( and considered serious adverse events if they led to any of the following: (1) a life-threatening illness or injury, (2) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, (3) in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, or (4) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function.


      Overall, 1,333 older patients (ages 75–79: n = 601; 80–84: n = 474; and ≥85: n = 258) underwent elective EVAR in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment data set and were included in the present analysis. In total, 12 patients (0.9%) died perioperatively, and 103 patients (7.7%) experienced ≥1 in-hospital serious adverse event, with 18 patients (1.3%) experiencing >1 in-hospital complications. No significant differences were seen between the age groups in the rates of in-hospital serious adverse events (7.3% vs 8.2% vs 7.8%; P = .86). In logistic regression analysis, a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio = 2.014; 95% confidence interval, 1.215–3.340; P = .006) and prior requirement for dialysis (odds ratio = 4.655; 95% confidence interval, 1.087–19.928; P = .038) resulted as predictors for occurrence of in-hospital serious adverse events. In the whole cohort, the 5-year survival was 63% for patients who did not experience any in-hospital serious adverse events compared with 51% for those who experienced any complications (P = .003). Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, it was found that the occurrence of in-hospital serious adverse events (hazard ratio = 6.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.8–21.317; P = .003) and being underweight (hazard ratio = 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.371–35.783; P = .019) were the only independent predictors of death in ≤30 days from the initial intervention. Although age did not independently affect the risk for all-cause mortality in ≤180 days after the initial intervention, increasing age was associated with a higher risk for long-term death (ie, ≥181 days from index elective EVAR) in the multivariable analysis (ages 75–79: hazard ratio = 0.379; 95% confidence interval, 0.281–0.512; P < .001; and 80–84: hazard ratio = 0.562; 95% confidence interval, 0.419–0.754; P < .001).


      After elective EVAR in older patients (ie, ≥75 years), the occurrence of in-hospital serious adverse events appears to increase the risk of death, particularly in ≤180 days after the initial elective EVAR intervention, and might be related to patient baseline characteristics, including history of pulmonary and renal disease.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Dua A.
        • Kuy S.
        • Lee C.J.
        • Upchurch G.R.
        • Desai S.S.
        Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010.
        J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59: 1512-1517
        • Biancari F.
        • Catania A.
        • D’Andrea V.
        Elective endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients aged 80 years and older: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011; 42: 571-576
        • Han Y.
        • Zhang S.
        • Zhang J.
        • Ji C.
        • Eckstein H.H.
        Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians: meta-analysis and systematic review.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017; 54: 454-463
        • Nejim B.
        • Zarkowsky D.
        • Hicks C.W.
        • Locham S.
        • Dakour Aridi H.
        • Malas M.B.
        Predictors of in-hospital adverse events after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
        J Vasc Surg. 2019; 70: 80-91
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Henderson W.G.
        • DePalma R.G.
        • Mosca C.
        • Healey N.A.
        • Kumbhani D.J.
        Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications.
        Trans Meet Am Surg Assoc. 2005; 123: 32-48
        • Howard D.P.J.
        • Marron C.D.
        • Sideso E.
        • Puckridge P.J.
        • Verhoeven E.L.G.
        • Spark J.I.
        • Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT) Investigators
        Editor’s choice – influence of proximal aortic neck diameter on durabillity of aneurysm sealing and overall survival in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair: real world data from the Gore Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT).
        Eur J Vasc Endovas. Surg. 2018; 56: 189-199
        • Wanhainen A.
        • Verzini F.
        • Van Herzeele I.
        • et al.
        Editor’s choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 57: 8-93
        • O’Donnell T.F.X.
        • Wade J.E.
        • Lian P.
        • et al.
        Endovascular aneurysm repair in patients over 75 is associated with excellent 5-year survival, which suggests benefit from expanded screening into this cohort.
        J Vasc Surg. 2019; 69: 728-737
        • Kent C.G.
        • Zwolak R.M.
        • Egorova N.N.
        • et al.
        Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals.
        J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52: 539-548
        • Divo M.J.
        • Martinez C.H.
        • Mannino D.M.
        Ageing and the epidemiology of multimorbidity.
        Eur Resp J. 2014; 44: 1055-1068
        • Varkevisser R.R.B.
        • Carvalho Mota M.T.
        • et al.
        Long-term age-stratified survival following endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
        J Vasc Surg. 2022; 76: 99-907
        • Rueda-Ochoa O.L.
        • van Bakel P.
        • Hoeks S.E.
        • et al.
        Survival after uncomplicated EVAR in octogenarians is similar to the general population of octogenarians without an abdominal aortic aneurysm.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020; 59: 740-747
        • Varkevisser R.R.B.
        • O’Donnell T.F.X.
        • et al.
        Factors associated with in-hospital complications and long-term implications of these complications in elderly patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair.
        J Vasc Surg. 2020; 71: 470-480
        • Harris D.G.
        • Bulatao I.
        • Oates C.P.
        • et al.
        Functional status predicts major complications and death after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
        J Vasc Surg. 2017; 66: 743-750
        • Kauvar D.S.
        • Martin E.D.
        • Simon T.E.
        • Givens M.D.
        Complication profile, failure to rescue, and mortality following elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
        Am J Surg. 2017; 214: 307-311
        • Hicks C.W.
        • O’Kelly A.
        • Obeid T.
        • Locham S.
        • Malas M.B.
        Predicting failure to rescue after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in elderly patients.
        J Surg Res. 2017; 217: 265-270
        • Barbey S.M.
        • Scali S.T.
        • Kubilis P.
        • et al.
        Interaction between frailty and sex on mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
        J Vasc Surg. 2019; 70: 1831-1843
        • Houghton J.S.M.
        • Nickinson A.T.O.
        • Morton A.J.
        • et al.
        Frailty factors and outcomes in vascular surgery patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Surg. 2020; 272: 266-276
        • Drudi L.M.
        • ades M.
        • Landry T.
        • et al.
        Scoping review of frailty in vascular surgery.
        J Vasc Surg. 2019; 69: 198-1998
        • Dakour-Aridi H.
        • Paracha N.Z.
        • Locham S.
        • Nejim B.
        • Mals M.B.
        Assessment of failure to rescue after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program procedure-targeted data set.
        J Vasc Surg. 2018; 68: 1335-1444
        • D’Oria M.
        • Scali S.
        • Mao J.
        • et al.
        Association between hospital volume and failure to rescue after open or endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the VASCUNET and International Consortium of Vascular Registries.
        Ann Surg. 2021; 1: e452-e459
        • Scali S.T.
        • Columbo J.A.
        • Suckow B.D.
        • et al.
        Center volume is associated with diminished failure to rescue and improved outcomes following elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
        J Vasc Surg. 2022; 76: 400-408.e2
        • Lepidi S.
        • D’Oria M.
        Long-term benefits of EVAR in the modern era: the importance of looking at stent-graft durability without forgetting the right pathophysiology.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020; 60: 956-957
        • Rich N.
        • Tucker L.Y.
        • Okuhn S.
        • et al.
        Long-term freedom from aneurysm-related mortality remains favorable after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysms repair in a 15-year multicenter registry.
        J Vasc Surg. 2020; 71: 790-798
        • Neal D.
        • Beck A.W.
        • Esalmi M.
        • et al.
        Validation of a preoperative prediction model for mortality within 1 year after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair of intact aneurysms.
        J Vasc Surg. 2019; 70: 449-461
        • Berghmans C.H.J.
        • Lubke T.
        • Brunkwall J.S.
        A cost calculation of EVAR and FEVAR procedures at an European academic hospital.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2019; 54: 205-214
        • Patel R.
        • Powell J.T.
        • Sweeting M.J.
        • Epstein D.M.
        • Barrett J.K.
        • Greenhalgh R.M.
        The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) randomized controlled trials: long-term follow-up and cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Health Technol Assess. 2018; 22: 1-132
        • D’Oria M.
        • Wanhainen A.
        • DeMartino R.R.
        • Oderich G.S.
        • Lepidi S.
        • Mani K.
        A scoping review of the rationale and evidence for cost-eefectiveness analysis of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair for intact complex aortic aneurysms.
        J Vasc Surg. 2020; 72: 1772-1782
        • D’Oria M.
        • Galeazzi E.
        • Veraldi G.F.
        • et al.
        Impact of proximal neck anatomy on short-term and mid-term outcomes after treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with new-generation low-profile endografts: results from the multicentric “ITAlian north-east registry of ENDOvascular aortic repair with the BOltOn Treo endograft (ITA-ENDOBOOT)”.
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2022; 80: 37-49
        • Marone E.M.
        • Freyrie A.
        • Ruotolo C.
        • et al.
        Expert opinion on hostile neck definition in endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (a Delphi Consensus).
        Ann Vasc Surg. 2020; 62: 173-182