Original Communications| Volume 125, ISSUE 2, P135-141, February 1999

Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: A randomized controlled trial


      Background: Voiding dysfunction is frequently observed after rectal resection and justifies urinary drainage. However, there is no agreement about the optimal duration of this postoperative drainage. The aim of this controlled trial was to compare 1 versus 5 days of transurethral catheterization after rectal resection, with special reference to urinary tract infection and bladder retention. Methods: One hundred twenty-six patients undergoing rectal resection were included in a prospective randomized study designed to compare the results for patients undergoing 1 day of transurethral catheterization after rectal resection (1-day group) with those for patients undergoing 5 days' catheterization (5-day group). Results: Patients were randomly assigned to the 1-day and 5-day groups (n = 64 and 62, respectively). Clinical findings and surgical procedures were comparable in both groups. Acute urinary retention occurred in 16 patients (25%) in the 1-day group versus 6 (10%) in the 5-day group (P < .05). Urinary tract infection was observed in 13 of 64 patients (20%) in the 1-day group versus 26 of 62 (42%) in the 5-day group (P < .01). Multivariate analysis revealed that after 1 day of catheterization carcinoma of the low rectum and lymph node metastasis were significant risk factors for acute urinary retention (P < .05 for both factors). After selection of patients without low rectum carcinoma, the acute urinary retention rate was comparable in both groups (14% in the 1-day group versus 7% in the 5-day group), but the urinary tract infection rate was significantly lower in the 1-day group versus the 5-day group (14% vs 40, P < .01). Conclusions: Our controlled study showed that after rectal resection 1 day of urinary drainage can be recommended for most patients. Five-day drainage should be reserved for patients with low rectal carcinoma. (Surgery 1999;125:135-41.)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Gerstenberg TC
        • Nielsen ML
        • Clausen S
        • Blaabjerg J
        • Lidenberg J.
        Bladder function after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for anorectal cancer: urodynamic investigation before and after operation in a consecutive series.
        Ann Surg. 1980; 191: 81-86
        • Zanolla R
        • Torelli T
        • Campo B
        • Ordesi G.
        Micturitional dysfunction after anterior resection for rectal cancer: rehabilitative treatment.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1988; 31: 707-709
        • Neal DE
        • Williams NS
        • Johnston D.
        A prospective study of bladder function before and after sphincter-saving resections for low carcinoma of the rectum.
        Br J Urol. 1981; 53: 558-564
        • Drake DB
        • Pemberton JH
        • Beart RW
        • Dozois RR
        • Wolff BG.
        Coloanal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease.
        Ann Surg. 1987; 206: 600-605
        • Burgos FJ
        • Romero J
        • Fernandez E
        • Perales L
        • Tallada M.
        Risk factors for developing voiding dysfunction after abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1988; 31: 682-685
        • Hojo K
        • Vernava AM
        • Sugihara K
        • Katumata K.
        Preservation of urine voiding and sexual function after rectal cancer surgery.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1991; 34: 532-539
        • Benoist S
        • Panis Y
        • Bolelawski E
        • Hautefeuille P
        • Valleur P.
        Functional outcome after coloanal versus low colorectal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma.
        J Am Coll Surg. 1997; 185: 114-119
        • Setia KK
        • Selkon JB
        • Berry AR
        • Turner CM.
        Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization.
        Br J Surg. 1987; 74: 624-627
        • O'Kelly TJ
        • Ross MS
        • Munro A
        Optimum method for urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial of suprapubic versus urethral catheterization.
        Br J Surg. 1995; 82: 1367-1368
        • Hallböök O
        • Pahlman L
        • Krog M
        • Wexner SD
        • Sjödahl R
        Randomized comparaison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection.
        Ann Surg. 1996; 224: 58-65
        • Ratnaval CD
        • Renwick P
        • Farouk R
        • Monson RT
        • Lee PWR.
        Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterisation of males undergoing pelvic colorectal surgery.
        Int J Colorect Dis. 1996; 11: 177-179
        • Carapeti EA
        • Bentley PG
        • Andrews SM.
        Randomized study of sterile versus non-sterile urethral catheterisation.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994; 76: 59-60
        • Givens CD
        • Wenzel RP.
        Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in surgical patients: a controlled study on the excess morbidity and costs.
        J Urol. 1980; 124: 646-648
        • Garibaldi RA
        • Burke JP
        • Dickman ML
        • Smith CB.
        Factor predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheterization.
        N Engl J Med. 1974; 291: 215-219
        • Stark RP
        • Maki DG.
        Bacteriuria in the catheterized patients: what quantitative level of bacteriuria is relevant?.
        N Engl J Med. 1984; 311: 560-564
        • Schiotz HA
        • Malme PA
        • Tanbo TG.
        Urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria after vaginal plastic surgery: a comparison of suprapubic and transurethral catheters.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989; 68: 453-455
        • Vandoni RE
        • Lironi A
        • Tschantz P.
        Bacteriuria during urinary tract catheterization: suprapubic versus urethral route: a prospective randomized trial.
        Acta Chir Belg. 1994; 94: 12-16
        • Platt R
        • Polk F
        • Murdock B
        • Rosner B.
        Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection.
        N Engl J Med. 1982; 307: 637-642
        • While JC
        • Blusse von Oud Albas A
        • Thewessen EA.
        Nosocomial catheter associated bacteriuria.
        J Hosp Infect. 1993; 27: 599-602
        • Carson CC.
        Nosocomial urinary tract infection.
        Surg Clin North Am. 1988; 68: 1147-1155
        • Van der Wall E
        • Verkooyen RP
        • Mintjes-de Groot J
        • Oostinga J
        • Van Dijk A
        • Hustinx WN
        • et al.
        Prophylactic ciprofloxacin for catheter associated urinary tract infection.
        Lancet. 1992; 339: 946-951
        • Mountokalakis TD
        • Betrosian AP.
        Ciprofloxacin to prevent catheter associated urinary tract infection.
        Lancet. 1992; 339: 1422-1423
        • Norman S.
        Postoperative urinary tract infection in urology and gynaecology: a review.
        J Roy Soc Med. 1980; 73: 739-742
        • Nickel JC
        • Feero P
        • Costerton JW
        • Wilson E.
        Incidence and importance of bacteriuria in postoperative, short-term urinary catheterization.
        Can J Surg. 1989; 32: 131-132
        • Peel AL
        • Benyon L
        • Grace RH.
        The value of routine preoperative urological assessment in patients undergoing elective surgery for diverticular disease or carcinoma of large bowel.
        Br J Surg. 1980; 67: 42-45
        • MacFarlane JK
        • Ryall RD
        • Heald RJ.
        Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
        Lancet. 1993; 341: 457-460
        • Lee JF
        • Maurer VM
        • Block GE.
        Anatomic relations of pelvic autonomic nerves to pelvic operation.
        Arch Surg. 1973; 107: 324-328
        • Shapiro J
        • Hoffmann J
        • Jersky J.
        A comparison of suprapubic and transurethral drainage for postoperative urinary retention in general surgical patients.
        Acta Chir Scand. 1982; 148: 323-327
        • Perrin LC
        • Penfold C
        • McLeish A.
        A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing suprapubic with urethral catheterization in rectal surgery.
        Aust N Z J Surg. 1997; 67: 554-556